Ariel Conversation - Revision history

Dubbayou2: /* II.A. */

2021-01-16T21:22:42Z

‎II.A.

Dubbayou2: /* p5 */

2021-01-16T21:14:40Z

‎p5

Dubbayou2: /* p.5 */

2021-01-16T20:48:36Z

‎p.5

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-16T20:48:27Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-16T20:44:15Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-16T20:43:23Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-16T20:11:06Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-16T19:55:55Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-15T00:06:29Z

‎p4

Dubbayou2: /* p4 */

2021-01-14T14:57:12Z

‎p4

@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 In the first pericope, the dry land was separated from the waters. Literally this would cause a high humidity as the land dried, forming a mist from the ground, now mentioned.
-But the purpose of verse 6 is to speak of the Eternal Word generating life and revealing himself through general revelation. This is recapitulated as Christ walks in the flesh and starts to gather his sheep from the dry ground -- the world which does not have the Word.
+But the purpose of verse 6 is to speak of the Eternal Word generating life and revealing himself through general revelation. This is recapitulated as Christ walks in the flesh and starts to gather his sheep from the dry ground -- the world which does not have the Word. It is also part of the parable of the sower when the seed is by the path.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 =p5=
 A proper understanding of the "Law of Recurrence" is that the story of Christ and the cross is recapitulated many times in many ways, and so pericopes sometimes look like each other because they contain similar details to other sections which tell the same story.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 98: / Line 98: @@
 . I am not sure how this was derived from the text.
-=p.5=
+=p5=
 A proper understanding of the "Law of Recurrence" is that the story of Christ and the cross is recapitulated many times in many ways, and so pericopes sometimes look like each other because they contain similar details to other sections which tell the same story.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 . I am not sure how this was derived from the text.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 :21. And God cased the man to die and he died and he married his limping side and delivered mankind.
 :22. From his death and it's teaching he made the church.
-:23. This is now the finished work of the cross of my finished work of the cross and my song of songs (the increase in the Son of God) and she will have the reputation (in symbol) of being the man who dies not understand, because she was taken from the man who does understand.
+:23. This is now the finished work of the cross of my finished work of the cross and my song of songs (the increase in the Son of God) and she will have the reputation (in symbol) of being the man who did not understand, because she was taken from the man who does understand.
 :24. Therefore Christ shall be a Father in the flesh to the bride, Father and Spirit and bride shall be one flesh.
 :25. And they were gathered together and were not ashamed.

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 =p4=
-This paragraph summarizes information which can be found in many 'Introduction' books. There is not evidence of the Spirit leading in understanding. A quick list of theology from this section includes:
+This paragraph summarizes information which can be found in many 'Introduction' books. There is not evidence of the Spirit leading in understanding. A quick list of theology from this section includes: (quick and rough parsing of the mystery)
 :6. The providence of God in general revelation
 :7. Adam came out of the ground 'Adamah'. There is a lesson in interpreting prophecy here: In Ge 1:2 we saw heaven expanded into 'the Spirit moved on the face of the waters'.  Here 'Adam' expands to 'the Spirit א on the face of the blood דם'  The shin ש speaks of the Spirit as the one giving the second life to the bride, the aleph א is the Spirit on the face of the waters giving the first life.
@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 :9. God expressed his holiness by the separation of the one tree (as the cross), into two trees representing life and fellowship in holiness or love (long-suffering and substitution comprehended by the knowledge of good and evil) through the death on the cross.
 :10-14  The Spirit came from eternity in humble pursuit of man, and spoke in four authorities or voices: prophet, judge, priest, king.
-..etc.
+:15. God gave man rest [[ינח]] in the garden, in a covering (cloud) עב from his law ד to guard it.
 Some of the theologies called out are not clear from the scriptures referenced.

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 . "Man has the capacity to serve God." This leaves much to the imagination.  We are told that all of our righteousness is liek filthy rags. <ref>[[Isa 64:6]] ¶ But we are all as an unclean [thing], and all our righteousnesses [are] as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away.</ref> This is because, as we will see later, we usurp God's position as the one who defines good and evil when we determine what our good works should look like. We can only please him if we do his works.
-. "Man is responsible to obey the Word of the Lord." It is almost irresponsible to say this knowing that no one does.  We are to marvel at his faithfulness, even when we are not.  <ref>[[2Ti 2:13]] If we believe not, [yet] he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.</ref>
+. "Man is responsible to obey the Word of the Lord." It is almost irresponsible to say this knowing that no one does.  We are to marvel at his faithfulness, even when we are not.  <ref>[[2Ti 2:13]] If we believe not, [yet] he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.</ref> As with the rich man who was compared to a camel, the challenge of the Word is to our flesh "If you are like God, then do what God has done."  ... and we fall short.
 =References=
 <references/>