In the beginning - Revision history

Dubbayou2 at 18:21, 9 September 2019

2019-09-09T18:21:50Z

Dubbayou2 at 17:04, 29 August 2019

2019-08-29T17:04:37Z

Tapsapar2 at 02:51, 15 August 2019

2019-08-15T02:51:31Z

Tapsapar2 at 16:40, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T16:40:46Z

Tapsapar2 at 16:37, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T16:37:22Z

Tapsapar2 at 16:35, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T16:35:45Z

Tapsapar2 at 16:33, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T16:33:52Z

Tapsapar2 at 14:07, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T14:07:53Z

Tapsapar2 at 14:07, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T14:07:13Z

Tapsapar2 at 14:05, 8 August 2019

2019-08-08T14:05:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 9 September 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category: Project]]		[[Category: Project]]
		+
		+	<font face="TimesNewRoman">
	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.		While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 29 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[Category: Project]]
	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.		While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 It is very possible that John may have written he narrative of his gospel first, and then came back to summarize all of it in these opening verses.  But he very clearly in these opening verses, shows the mission of the word—who he is, referring to him as word, and light and life.  Telling why he came—to make known the Father; to reveal God.  How he was received—there were twofold responses of either belief, or unbelief.  What he did in terms of giving light and giving life, and coming with grace and truth. What he revealed—all focusing around the mission of the Word.
-What is the meaning of this term ‘Logos’ or word.  The scripture makes a distinction between the Word of God written—which of course refers to holy Scripture—and the Word of God incarnate, which refers to Jesus Christ.  It interesting that John holds back in his use of the name Jesus Christ in this prologue.  Instead he gives him a different title.  And what an unusual name for Christ—"The Logos”—the Word.  Apparently, he did not coin the term.  He did not make-up a new word.  Instead he gave a new meaning to a word that was already in use.  There is wide spread speculation among the theologians as to the roots as to the origin of this term.  Where did it come from?  There are some who say that it comes as a carryover from Greek philosophy, the philosophy of Philo the Jew.  He was an Alexandrian, allegorizing, philosopher in the first century who used this word logos about 1300 times in his writings.  And yet it is never clear whether Philo meant an abstract impersonal force, or whether he meant the divine thought behind the universe.  It is unclear as to his meaning even though he uses the term so frequently.
+What is the meaning of this term ‘Logos’ or word?  The scripture makes a distinction between the Word of God written—which of course refers to holy Scripture—and the Word of God incarnate, which refers to Jesus Christ.  It interesting that John holds back in his use of the name Jesus Christ in this prologue.  Instead he gives him a different title.  And what an unusual name for Christ—"The Logos”—the Word.  Apparently, he did not coin the term.  He did not make-up a new word.  Instead he gave a new meaning to a word that was already in use.  There is wide spread speculation among the theologians as to the roots as to the origin of this term.  Where did it come from?  There are some who say that it comes as a carryover from Greek philosophy, the philosophy of Philo the Jew.  He was an Alexandrian, allegorizing, philosopher in the first century who used this word logos about 1300 times in his writings.  And yet it is never clear whether Philo meant an abstract impersonal force, or whether he meant the divine thought behind the universe.  It is unclear as to his meaning even though he uses the term so frequently.
 Unique to the autoptic gospel is John’s use of repetition (arguably a poetic device) early in his Gospel narrative. From the beginning, his provocative anaphoric use of use of “word” serves to conjoin the notions of the term ‘logos’ (λόγος) (Greek for ‘word’) and the repetition serves to “underline the thought he would communicate.”   John’s penchant for Hebrew parallelism is a prominent hallmark of style in the first ten lines of his gospel narrative. This parallelism whether meant to capture the attention of Hellenized Jews, or simply be thought provoking to any audience also serves to set John’s narrative apart from its synoptic cousins which share more provincial openings. Beasley-Murray (1987) posits the “poetic quality of the prologue is observable, even in translation.”  And, in fact, C.F. Burney (1922) maintains John’s poetic style is indicative of an “Aramaic original.”

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 8 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews ~~where~~ have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.	+	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.

	We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.		We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 8 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews where have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.	+	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews where have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into a condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.

	We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.		We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 8 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts ~~has a similar~~ prologue ~~to John~~. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews where have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.	+	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts is comparable John's prologue. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews where have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.

	We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.		We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 8 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	While John’s prologue is unique among the gospels, the first five verses of the book of Acts has a similar prologue to John. Also, the opening verse of 1 John, or the book of Hebrews where have similar prologues. But in these 18 verses, John compresses the Gospel into condensed form. He gives the setting; he states the theme; he introduces the main character and he relates the elements of conflict. Every good novel must have conflict to make a plot. And here the conflict is between belief and unbelief.
		+
		+	We find that the language of these opening eight verses is more formal than is true in the rest of the book. And there are some scholars that feel these verses are an adaptation of some early Christian hymn. Reading through these 18 verses, we note the pattern that is involved. Verses 1-5 talk about “the Word.” Verses 6-8 speak about John the Baptist. Verse 9-14 again underscore “the Word.” Verse 15 refers back to John. And then the concluding verses 16-18, come back to “the Word.” So, it’s the word, and John and the word, and John, and then the Word. That is the pattern, or the structure of these opening verses.
		+
		+	It is very possible that John may have written he narrative of his gospel first, and then came back to summarize all of it in these opening verses. But he very clearly in these opening verses, shows the mission of the word—who he is, referring to him as word, and light and life. Telling why he came—to make known the Father; to reveal God. How he was received—there were twofold responses of either belief, or unbelief. What he did in terms of giving light and giving life, and coming with grace and truth. What he revealed—all focusing around the mission of the Word.
		+
		+	What is the meaning of this term ‘Logos’ or word. The scripture makes a distinction between the Word of God written—which of course refers to holy Scripture—and the Word of God incarnate, which refers to Jesus Christ. It interesting that John holds back in his use of the name Jesus Christ in this prologue. Instead he gives him a different title. And what an unusual name for Christ—"The Logos”—the Word. Apparently, he did not coin the term. He did not make-up a new word. Instead he gave a new meaning to a word that was already in use. There is wide spread speculation among the theologians as to the roots as to the origin of this term. Where did it come from? There are some who say that it comes as a carryover from Greek philosophy, the philosophy of Philo the Jew. He was an Alexandrian, allegorizing, philosopher in the first century who used this word logos about 1300 times in his writings. And yet it is never clear whether Philo meant an abstract impersonal force, or whether he meant the divine thought behind the universe. It is unclear as to his meaning even though he uses the term so frequently.
		+
	Unique to the autoptic gospel is John’s use of repetition (arguably a poetic device) early in his Gospel narrative. From the beginning, his provocative anaphoric use of use of “word” serves to conjoin the notions of the term ‘logos’ (λόγος) (Greek for ‘word’) and the repetition serves to “underline the thought he would communicate.” John’s penchant for Hebrew parallelism is a prominent hallmark of style in the first ten lines of his gospel narrative. This parallelism whether meant to capture the attention of Hellenized Jews, or simply be thought provoking to any audience also serves to set John’s narrative apart from its synoptic cousins which share more provincial openings. Beasley-Murray (1987) posits the “poetic quality of the prologue is observable, even in translation.” And, in fact, C.F. Burney (1922) maintains John’s poetic style is indicative of an “Aramaic original.”		Unique to the autoptic gospel is John’s use of repetition (arguably a poetic device) early in his Gospel narrative. From the beginning, his provocative anaphoric use of use of “word” serves to conjoin the notions of the term ‘logos’ (λόγος) (Greek for ‘word’) and the repetition serves to “underline the thought he would communicate.” John’s penchant for Hebrew parallelism is a prominent hallmark of style in the first ten lines of his gospel narrative. This parallelism whether meant to capture the attention of Hellenized Jews, or simply be thought provoking to any audience also serves to set John’s narrative apart from its synoptic cousins which share more provincial openings. Beasley-Murray (1987) posits the “poetic quality of the prologue is observable, even in translation.” And, in fact, C.F. Burney (1922) maintains John’s poetic style is indicative of an “Aramaic original.”

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 8 August 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Unique to the autoptic gospel is John’s use of repetition (arguably a poetic device) early in his Gospel narrative. From the beginning, his provocative anaphoric use of use of “word” serves to conjoin the notions of the term ‘logos’(λόγος) (Greek for ‘word’) and the repetition serves to “underline the thought he would communicate.” John’s penchant for Hebrew parallelism is a prominent hallmark of style in the first ten lines of his gospel narrative. This parallelism whether meant to capture the attention of Hellenized Jews, or simply be thought provoking to any audience also serves to set John’s narrative apart from its synoptic cousins which share more provincial openings. Beasley-Murray (1987) posits the “poetic quality of the prologue is observable, even in translation.” And, in fact, C.F. Burney (1922) maintains John’s poetic style is indicative of an “Aramaic original.”	+	Unique to the autoptic gospel is John’s use of repetition (arguably a poetic device) early in his Gospel narrative. From the beginning, his provocative anaphoric use of use of “word” serves to conjoin the notions of the term ‘logos’ (λόγος) (Greek for ‘word’) and the repetition serves to “underline the thought he would communicate.” John’s penchant for Hebrew parallelism is a prominent hallmark of style in the first ten lines of his gospel narrative. This parallelism whether meant to capture the attention of Hellenized Jews, or simply be thought provoking to any audience also serves to set John’s narrative apart from its synoptic cousins which share more provincial openings. Beasley-Murray (1987) posits the “poetic quality of the prologue is observable, even in translation.” And, in fact, C.F. Burney (1922) maintains John’s poetic style is indicative of an “Aramaic original.”

	Adding to the provocative nature of John’s opening, Ernst Haenchen (1984) adds John’s parallel structure to Genesis 1 is no coincidence and “tells of something that was in existence already in time primeval” which is in fact the “Logos”—whatever this ‘Logos’ is—as it defies definition in most any modern language. This “elevated” state of “Logos” reaches such “heights that it almost becomes offensive.”		Adding to the provocative nature of John’s opening, Ernst Haenchen (1984) adds John’s parallel structure to Genesis 1 is no coincidence and “tells of something that was in existence already in time primeval” which is in fact the “Logos”—whatever this ‘Logos’ is—as it defies definition in most any modern language. This “elevated” state of “Logos” reaches such “heights that it almost becomes offensive.”

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 Bibliography
-Beasley-Murray, George R. John. Word Biblical Commentary. Word Book Publishers, Waco,
+Beasley-Murray, George R. ''John'' (Word Biblical Commentary). Word Book Publishers, Waco,
 .
-Burney, Rev. C. F. Burney. The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel. Oxford University Press,
+Burney, Rev. C. F. Burney. ''The Aramaic Origin of the Fourth Gospel''. Oxford University Press,
 .
-Brown, Raymond. The Gospel of John. The Anchor Bible. Double Day and Company, New
+Brown, Raymond. ''The Gospel of John''. The Anchor Bible. Double Day and Company, New
 York, 1966.
-Haenchen, Ernst. John Hermeneia.  Fortress Press, Philadelphia 1984.
+Haenchen, Ernst. ''John'' (Hermeneia).  Fortress Press, Philadelphia 1984.
-Tenney, Merril C. John, The Gospel of Belief. William. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,
+Tenney, Merril C. ''John, The Gospel of Belief''. William. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company,
 Grand Rapids, 1976.
-Scroggie, Graham. A Guide to the Gospels. Kregel Publishing, Grand Rapids, 1995.
+Scroggie, Graham. ''A Guide to the Gospels''. Kregel Publishing, Grand Rapids, 1995.