<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://sensusplenior.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mark_included</id>
		<title>Mark included - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sensusplenior.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Mark_included"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sensusplenior.net/wiki/index.php?title=Mark_included&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-10-13T18:00:53Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.28.3</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://sensusplenior.net/wiki/index.php?title=Mark_included&amp;diff=34469&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Pig: Created page with &quot;{{bl| Mark included }}  There are very few teachings in Mark that are not included in Matthew. Effectively Matthew could be seen as Mark (edition 2) with new material added....&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sensusplenior.net/wiki/index.php?title=Mark_included&amp;diff=34469&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2023-01-03T02:42:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{bl| Mark included }}  There are very few teachings in Mark that are not included in Matthew. Effectively Matthew could be seen as Mark (edition 2) with new material added....&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{bl| Mark included }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are very few teachings in Mark that are not included in Matthew. Effectively Matthew could be seen as Mark (edition 2) with new material added.  As we run into these we will discuss plausible reasons from the theme and purpose why they may have been left out. This does not intimate that they are not true, but that at the time of Matthew, they were no longer the focus of teaching within the church.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pig</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>