Old Main Page - Revision history

Dubbayou2: Dubbayou2 moved page Main Page to Old Main Page

2015-05-21T00:16:52Z

Dubbayou2 moved page Main Page to Old Main Page

Dubbayou2 at 00:13, 18 May 2015

2015-05-18T00:13:11Z

Dubbayou2 at 18:38, 16 May 2015

2015-05-16T18:38:30Z

Dubbayou2: /* New!!! */

2015-05-16T18:31:04Z

‎New!!!

Dubbayou2: /* New!!! */

2015-05-16T18:30:20Z

‎New!!!

Dubbayou2: /* Tools */

2015-01-20T00:49:48Z

‎Tools

Dubbayou2: /* Some stuff */

2014-12-29T21:45:43Z

‎Some stuff

Dubbayou2: /* Some stuff */

2014-12-26T16:00:16Z

‎Some stuff

Dubbayou2: /* Some stuff */

2014-12-26T15:58:54Z

‎Some stuff

Dubbayou2 at 15:58, 26 December 2014

2014-12-26T15:58:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 18 May 2015
Line 8:		Line 8:

	=New!!!=		=New!!!=
		+	'''Now enabled for mobile!!'''
		+
		+
	[http://sensusplenior.net/phpbb/ Forum for discussions on sensus plenior]. This is not real time. It is like a bulletin board where you can post things and get replies. Everything is still free and free of ads. It should be a child-safe environment. There's a no tolerance policy for people who are misbehaving. It is designed and formatted for topics concerning sensus plenior, so you don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff like in other forums.		[http://sensusplenior.net/phpbb/ Forum for discussions on sensus plenior]. This is not real time. It is like a bulletin board where you can post things and get replies. Everything is still free and free of ads. It should be a child-safe environment. There's a no tolerance policy for people who are misbehaving. It is designed and formatted for topics concerning sensus plenior, so you don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff like in other forums.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:38, 16 May 2015
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Currently there is little there. I will use it to point to new stuff in the wiki, and to dialog with those who wish to participate. You can share things that you think are sensus plenior, and we can help you sort it out. We don't debate and argue sensus plenior. Since it is self-correcting, we collaborate to solve riddles.		Currently there is little there. I will use it to point to new stuff in the wiki, and to dialog with those who wish to participate. You can share things that you think are sensus plenior, and we can help you sort it out. We don't debate and argue sensus plenior. Since it is self-correcting, we collaborate to solve riddles.
		+
		+	With more than 1400 returning visitors to the site, I feel like I am writing into a black hole. I can share best with feedback. I am an evangelist, not an author, so I am accustomed to having some sort of feedback, and stopped work on projects even though I thought they were going well, because I thought no one was reading them. Thanks for visiting. I hope it blesses you.
		+

	==Sensus plenior – the deeper meaning of scripture.==		==Sensus plenior – the deeper meaning of scripture.==

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 =New!!!=
-Forum for discussions on sensus plenior. This is not real time. It is like a bulletin board where you can post things and get replies. Everything is still free and free of ads. It should be a child-safe environment. There's a no tolerance policy for people who are misbehaving. It is designed and formatted for topics concerning sensus plenior, so you don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff like in other forums.
+[http://sensusplenior.net/phpbb/ Forum for discussions on sensus plenior]. This is not real time. It is like a bulletin board where you can post things and get replies. Everything is still free and free of ads. It should be a child-safe environment. There's a no tolerance policy for people who are misbehaving. It is designed and formatted for topics concerning sensus plenior, so you don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff like in other forums.
 Currently there is little there. I will use it to point to new stuff in the wiki, and to dialog with those who wish to participate. You can share things that you think are sensus plenior, and we can help you sort it out. We don't debate and argue sensus plenior. Since it is self-correcting, we collaborate to solve riddles.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 =New!!!=
-Videos  -> [[Goatherd%27s_Guide_to_the_Bible]]
+Forum for discussions on sensus plenior. This is not real time. It is like a bulletin board where you can post things and get replies. Everything is still free and free of ads. It should be a child-safe environment. There's a no tolerance policy for people who are misbehaving. It is designed and formatted for topics concerning sensus plenior, so you don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff like in other forums.
 ==Sensus plenior – the deeper meaning of scripture.==

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 [[:Category: HebDict | '''Hebrew Dictionary''']]
 ::The addition of modern vowels to the Hebrew text of scripture around 500-600 AD only served to [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/obfuscate obfuscate] the sensus plenior. This dictionary rectifies that by combining morphologically identical words into one word.
 [[:Category: Metaphor | '''Metaphor''']]

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:16, 21 May 2015
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 29 December 2014
Line 32:		Line 32:

	'''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'''		'''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'''
−	:The GOT will be presented as notes someone (probably a guy named Thomas) took while being taught how to read the sensus plenior of scripture. I don't make the the claim that GOT should be scripture. But it would be similar to any modern book about the Bible. You will not find Gnostic or occult teaching here. I believe that you will find the GOT to be thoroughly orthodox in its doctrine of Christ. But more importantly, it is a witness that early Christians read the Bible the way presented here. It is not required to understand sensus plenior since the methods are taught in the Bible, and I stumbled across it late in my studies.	+	:The GOT will be presented as notes someone (probably a guy named Thomas) took while being taught how to read the sensus plenior of scripture. I don't make the the claim that GOT should be scripture. But it would be similar to any modern book about the Bible. You will not find Gnostic or occult teaching here. I believe that you will find the GOT to be thoroughly orthodox in its doctrine of Christ. But more importantly, it is a witness that early Christians read the Bible the way presented here. GOT is not required to understand sensus plenior since the methods are taught in the Bible, and I stumbled across it late in my studies.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:00, 26 December 2014
Line 32:		Line 32:

	'''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'''		'''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'''
−	:The GOT will be presented as notes someone (probably a guy named Thomas) took while being taught how to read the sensus plenior of scripture. I don't make the the claim that GOT should be scripture. But it would be similar to any modern book about the Bible. You will not find Gnostic or occult teaching here. I believe that you will find the GOT to be thoroughly orthodox in its doctrine of Christ. But more importantly, it is a witness that early Christians read the Bible the way presented here. It is not required since the methods are taught in the Bible, and ~~in fact,~~ I stumbled across it late.	+	:The GOT will be presented as notes someone (probably a guy named Thomas) took while being taught how to read the sensus plenior of scripture. I don't make the the claim that GOT should be scripture. But it would be similar to any modern book about the Bible. You will not find Gnostic or occult teaching here. I believe that you will find the GOT to be thoroughly orthodox in its doctrine of Christ. But more importantly, it is a witness that early Christians read the Bible the way presented here. It is not required to understand sensus plenior since the methods are taught in the Bible, and I stumbled across it late in my studies.

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 '''[[The_Director%27s_Bible | The Director's Bible]]'''
-::One attempt to explain the nature of divine inspiration. It is a casual conversation about the Bible as it should be read in order to determine God's intent. If parts of it become too complicated, just speed on by and you will be able to pick it up again in the next chapter.
+:One attempt to explain the nature of divine inspiration. It is a casual conversation about the Bible as it should be read in order to determine God's intent. If parts of it become too complicated, just speed on by and you will be able to pick it up again in the next chapter.
 '''[[Gospel of Thomas]]'''

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 This web site shares raw study notes concerning sensus plenior. Someday someone may write a book, but it most likely won't be me. This is not a normal wiki where each article is complete in itself.  This is a hyper-book. It is expected that you will follow links that interest you since they explain the topic in more detail. It is also a way I can document things for myself without concerning myself with the completeness of each thought. Welcome to my brain on wiki.
-As you follow links, you may wish to bookmark where you branched from an article, or use your 'Backspace' key to return to where you were before you followed a link.
+As you follow links, you may wish to bookmark where you branched from an article, or use your 'Backspace' key to return to where you were before you followed a link.  You will also find many red links. These are dead end links, but they may not be useless. I link all Bible verses though I may not have a page for each. You may follow the dead end link then select "What links here" from the navigation menu to the left. This will give you a listing of all the pages that reference that verse.
 I start a project and get distracted by something. So if there is something of particular interest, please ask, and I will happily be distracted from my current project to answer.