The 'Q' document - Revision history

Dubbayou2 at 02:25, 5 March 2017

2017-03-05T02:25:33Z

Dubbayou2 at 02:24, 5 March 2017

2017-03-05T02:24:34Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:07, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:07:51Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:05, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:05:58Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:05, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:05:05Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:02, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:02:35Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:01, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:01:40Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:01, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:01:16Z

Dubbayou2 at 22:00, 4 March 2017

2017-03-04T22:00:09Z

Dubbayou2: Created page with "Many Biblical scholars look for subtle ways to discredit the Bible. Such is the invention of the 'Q' document. It is an imaginary document said to predate Matthew and Luke, fr..."

2017-03-04T21:58:19Z

Created page with "Many Biblical scholars look for subtle ways to discredit the Bible. Such is the invention of the 'Q' document. It is an imaginary document said to predate Matthew and Luke, fr..."

New page

Many Biblical scholars look for subtle ways to discredit the Bible. Such is the invention of the 'Q' document. It is an imaginary document said to predate Matthew and Luke, from which Matthew and Luke drew their material. They theoretically used it to embellish the Book of Mark to produce their own books.

Consider the ramifications if that were true. It would mean that there was a source which was more authoritative than Matthew and Luke which has been lost. The reason given that no one mentions it is that it was confusing, and Matthew and Luke had to make it's teachings more understandable.

The claim then is that God inspired a work which no one could understand and so the Greeks had to interpret God to man in a way he could understand. Furthermore, it implies that many jots and tittles from Gods word were lost.

The reason scholars need to believe in mythical scriptures is because they do not understand where Matthew and Luke (and John), many years later, got the material that wasn't available to Mark.

The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. THe apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery. The more they studied, the more they understood, and so the more they shared.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:25, 5 March 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{:Head: Blog}}
		+
	Many Biblical scholars look for subtle ways to discredit the Bible. Such is the invention of the 'Q' document. It is an imaginary document said to predate Matthew and Luke, from which Matthew and Luke drew their material. They theoretically used it to embellish the Book of Mark to produce their own books.		Many Biblical scholars look for subtle ways to discredit the Bible. Such is the invention of the 'Q' document. It is an imaginary document said to predate Matthew and Luke, from which Matthew and Luke drew their material. They theoretically used it to embellish the Book of Mark to produce their own books.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 :The differences in how stories are told between the gospel authors tell us how much more they could understand the prophetic riddles of the Old Testament. They were able to correlate even more details concerning the life of Christ with the prophetic riddles. Some details did not need repeated since they were well known from previous teachings.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 :The differences in how stories are told between the gospel authors tell us how much more they could understand the prophetic riddles of the Old Testament. They were able to correlate even more details concerning the life of Christ with the prophetic riddles. Some details did not need repeated since they were well known from previous teachings.
 =References=
 <references/>

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. The apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery.  The more they studied, the more they understood. <ref>[[2Ti 2:15]] Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.</ref>
-THe more they studied, the more that the Holy Spirit brought things to remembrance that they had been taught <ref>Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.</ref> and so the more they shared.
+The more they studied, the more the Holy Spirit brought things to remembrance that they had been taught <ref>Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.</ref> and so the more they shared.
 As mentioned earlier:

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 The reason scholars need to believe in mythical scriptures is because they do not understand where Matthew and Luke (and John), many years later, got the material that wasn't available to Mark.
-The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. The apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery.  The more they studied, the more they understood, and so the more they shared. <ref>[[2Ti 2:15]] Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.</ref>
+The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. The apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery.  The more they studied, the more they understood. <ref>[[2Ti 2:15]] Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.</ref>
 As mentioned earlier:

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Consider the ramifications if that were true. It would mean that there was a source which was more authoritative than Matthew and Luke which has been lost. The reason given that no one mentions it is that it was confusing, and Matthew and Luke had to make it's teachings more understandable.
-The claim then is that God inspired a work which no one could understand and so the Greeks had to interpret God to man in a way he could understand. Furthermore, it implies that many jots and tittles from Gods word were lost.
+The claim then is that God inspired a work which no one could understand and so the Greeks had to interpret God to man in a way he could understand. Furthermore, it implies that many jots and tittles from Gods word were lost. <ref>[[Mt 5:18]] For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.</ref>
 The reason scholars need to believe in mythical scriptures is because they do not understand where Matthew and Luke (and John), many years later, got the material that wasn't available to Mark.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:01, 4 March 2017
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:The differences in how stories are told between the gospel authors tell us how much more they could understand the prophetic riddles of the Old Testament. They were able to correlate even more details concerning the life of Christ with the prophetic riddles. Some details did not need repeated since they were well known from previous teachings.		:The differences in how stories are told between the gospel authors tell us how much more they could understand the prophetic riddles of the Old Testament. They were able to correlate even more details concerning the life of Christ with the prophetic riddles. Some details did not need repeated since they were well known from previous teachings.
		+
		+	=References=
		+	<references/>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 4 March 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. THe apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery. The more they studied, the more they understood, and so the more they shared.		The answer is plain. The mystery which was hidden from the beginning was revealed through Christ and the cross. THe apostles did not get magic knowledge, or a tiny taste of omniscience, but they studied the scriptures in the context of the resurrection, to understand the mystery. The more they studied, the more they understood, and so the more they shared.
		+
		+	As mentioned earlier:
		+
		+	:Mark wrote that the story began with the preaching of John the Baptist. <ref>[[Mr 1:1]] ¶ The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; Mr 1:2 As it is written in the prophets, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, which shall prepare thy way before thee.</ref> Later, with more time to study, they saw the prophetic riddles extending back to Abraham. Matthew begins his gospel there.<ref>[[Mt 1:1]] ¶ The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.</ref> With more time, Luke was able to push the beginning of the story back to Adam. <ref>[[Lu 3:38]] Which was [the son] of Enos, which was [the son] of Seth, which was [the son] of Adam, which was [the son] of God.</ref> And with the most time, and isolation on a prison island, John was able to push the start of the story all the way back to the first words of Genesis. <ref>[[Joh 1:1]] ¶ In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.</ref>
		+
		+	:The differences in how stories are told between the gospel authors tell us how much more they could understand the prophetic riddles of the Old Testament. They were able to correlate even more details concerning the life of Christ with the prophetic riddles. Some details did not need repeated since they were well known from previous teachings.