Difference between revisions of "Through a marriage - ט"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The bride ז was a surprise of the cross because it was hidden in the mystery. But the bride doesn't just appear. She becomes the bride through the marriage of the lamb. | + | The bride ז was a surprise of the cross because it was hidden in the mystery. But the bride doesn't just appear. She becomes the bride through the marriage of the lamb. <ref>[[Re 19:7]] Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.</ref> It would seem that since this is mentioned in the book of Revelation that the marriage would take place in the future; but only if you assume the Book of Revelation talks about the future. |
| − | + | we have seen that the primary difficulty the church has had with interpreting scripture is that it has not properly identified the genre of scripture. Why would we trust it now? Seminarians say that we should read the most symbolic book of the Bible '''literally'''! It is a book of symbols! Why would you try to read it literally? | |
| − | + | It is a revelation of Jesus Christ. He was revealed in resurrection! The book of revelation tells the same story as the mystery contained in the OT, but now puts it on full display in it's symbolism. It is like the Rosetta stone, allowing us to interpret the symbols of the OT scripture. | |
| − | |||
| − | + | What is the 'marriage supper of the lamb'? <ref>[[Re 19:9]] And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed [are] they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.</ref> | |
| + | |||
| + | Consider these symbols: | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 19 April 2018
The bride ז was a surprise of the cross because it was hidden in the mystery. But the bride doesn't just appear. She becomes the bride through the marriage of the lamb. [1] It would seem that since this is mentioned in the book of Revelation that the marriage would take place in the future; but only if you assume the Book of Revelation talks about the future.
we have seen that the primary difficulty the church has had with interpreting scripture is that it has not properly identified the genre of scripture. Why would we trust it now? Seminarians say that we should read the most symbolic book of the Bible literally! It is a book of symbols! Why would you try to read it literally?
It is a revelation of Jesus Christ. He was revealed in resurrection! The book of revelation tells the same story as the mystery contained in the OT, but now puts it on full display in it's symbolism. It is like the Rosetta stone, allowing us to interpret the symbols of the OT scripture.
What is the 'marriage supper of the lamb'? [2]
- ↑ Re 19:7 Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready.
- ↑ Re 19:9 And he saith unto me, Write, Blessed [are] they which are called unto the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he saith unto me, These are the true sayings of God.
