Difference between revisions of "Creation study guide - Introduction"
(→Creation study guide - Introduction) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Previously, the pattern using heaven, light, water and dry ground was observed. In the study guide, you were told that it was there and to look for it. How many people never noticed? Even if you noticed the L-W-G pattern, it is unlikely that you found the bookend to H by yourself. Even theologians miss it, which is why the myth of a contradiction between the first and second accounts of creation. Even Hebrew experts miss that the second sequence came ''from'' the second sequence because they are not familiar with the practice of notarikon. They may observe that dat 5 is from day 2, and day 6 is from day 3, but they miss that day 4 is from day 1 because the word for 'lights' [[מארת]] is broken into 'from [[מ]] light [[שר]] ( the tov [[ת]] makes it an object)'. | Previously, the pattern using heaven, light, water and dry ground was observed. In the study guide, you were told that it was there and to look for it. How many people never noticed? Even if you noticed the L-W-G pattern, it is unlikely that you found the bookend to H by yourself. Even theologians miss it, which is why the myth of a contradiction between the first and second accounts of creation. Even Hebrew experts miss that the second sequence came ''from'' the second sequence because they are not familiar with the practice of notarikon. They may observe that dat 5 is from day 2, and day 6 is from day 3, but they miss that day 4 is from day 1 because the word for 'lights' [[מארת]] is broken into 'from [[מ]] light [[שר]] ( the tov [[ת]] makes it an object)'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | =Notarikon= | ||
Revision as of 07:05, 21 November 2020
Creation study guide - Introduction - The nature and purpose of close reading.
Creation study guide - Introduction
Previously, the pattern using heaven, light, water and dry ground was observed. In the study guide, you were told that it was there and to look for it. How many people never noticed? Even if you noticed the L-W-G pattern, it is unlikely that you found the bookend to H by yourself. Even theologians miss it, which is why the myth of a contradiction between the first and second accounts of creation. Even Hebrew experts miss that the second sequence came from the second sequence because they are not familiar with the practice of notarikon. They may observe that dat 5 is from day 2, and day 6 is from day 3, but they miss that day 4 is from day 1 because the word for 'lights' מארת is broken into 'from מ light שר ( the tov ת makes it an object)'.
=Notarikon=
