Difference between revisions of "TYMK - Knowing the unknowable God"

From Sensus Plenior
Jump to: navigation, search
(Is knowable)
(Is knowable)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
The accusation makes us flinch while subtly we embrace the forced idea, like a magician forcing upon us, the card he wants us to have. The intellectual sleight of hand distracts us from recognizing the same old challenge of the serpent: ''Did God really say? (Ge 3) Did you really hear him right? Did you understand? Certainly your reason is better than your hearing or memory.''
 
The accusation makes us flinch while subtly we embrace the forced idea, like a magician forcing upon us, the card he wants us to have. The intellectual sleight of hand distracts us from recognizing the same old challenge of the serpent: ''Did God really say? (Ge 3) Did you really hear him right? Did you understand? Certainly your reason is better than your hearing or memory.''
  
=Is knowable=
+
=Is knowable <ref>If you are paying close attention, you may wish to cry, "Foul!". You may observe that it appears that I am using the Bible as fact when I haven't proven it to be fact.  If this were the proof section of the presentation, it would be cheating, but we are still in the introduction.</ref> =
  
 
'''But God said:'''
 
'''But God said:'''
Line 19: Line 19:
 
:''[[Ro 1:19]] ¶ Because that which may be '''known''' of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.''
 
:''[[Ro 1:19]] ¶ Because that which may be '''known''' of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.''
  
<font face="TimesNewRoman" size=2>
+
 
'''Note:'''
+
=References=
If you are paying close attention, you may wish to cry, "Foul!". You may observe that it appears that I am using the Bible as fact when I haven't proven it to be fact.  If this were the proof section of the presentation, it would be cheating, but we are still in the introduction.
+
<references>

Revision as of 14:23, 2 March 2018

The unknowable God...

Did that title disturb you in the least? It has been such a common phrase used in and outside of the church that we rarely give it a thought. Everyone knows that God is unknowable. We don't flinch at the thought of God being unknowable, but we flinch at the accusation we would fight over the unknowable:

“It is natural that people should differ most, and most violently, about the unknowable . . . There is all the room in the world for divergence of opinion about something that, so far as we can realistically perceive, does not exist.”

― E. Haldeman-Julius (a guy with a black and white photo on the internet, so it must be true.)

The accusation makes us flinch while subtly we embrace the forced idea, like a magician forcing upon us, the card he wants us to have. The intellectual sleight of hand distracts us from recognizing the same old challenge of the serpent: Did God really say? (Ge 3) Did you really hear him right? Did you understand? Certainly your reason is better than your hearing or memory.

Is knowable [1]

But God said:

Isa 43:10 Ye are my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.
Joh 17:3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent.
Ro 1:19 ¶ Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them.


References

<references>

  1. If you are paying close attention, you may wish to cry, "Foul!". You may observe that it appears that I am using the Bible as fact when I haven't proven it to be fact. If this were the proof section of the presentation, it would be cheating, but we are still in the introduction.